What can you say about the Betsy Ross House? Located in the heart of historic Old City Philadelphia, the Betsy Ross House is one of several attractions dealing with birth of America. The museum offers a look at the life of Betsy Ross – supposed resident of the Arch Street property from 1773 to 1785, alleged creator of the first American flag, and the best known female figure of the Revolutionary period. Indeed, Ross often seems the lone female figure of the Revolutionary War, standing alongside Washington in the popular memory as America’s founding mother. It is hard not to be cynical about such a place.On one hand the Betsy Ross House is an old-fashioned tourist trap, filled with patriotic pabulum/hokum, on the other it is an attempt to inject a woman’s story into the male dominated Revolutionary narrative. It is in telling the story of a woman artisan, providing a glimpse into domestic and working life at the end of 18th century, that the museum is most successful.
Betsy Ross as is a 19th century creation. The emergence of Ross as an iconic American figure parallels the creation of the Betsy Ross House museum. The origins of both are problematic at best. The story of Ross as creator of the first American flag and the importance of the house as site of creation and transaction was promoted by her family well after her death. Ross’ grandson William Canby first brought her story to public attention in an 1870 speech to the Historical Society of Pennsylvania and later, with “other members of Betsy's family signed sworn affidavits stating that they heard the story of the making of the first flag from Betsy's own mouth.” On the word of her surviving family members, the house was by the late nineteenth century “recognized as the place where [she] lived when she made the first American Flag.” The image of Ross in her parlor (a more genteel setting than her workshop) presenting the new flag to George Washington comes from this period as well, made famous in Charles Weisgerber’s painting, Birth of Our Nation’s Flag. By 1898 Weisgerber was living in the house, having helped mount a successful campaign to purchase it in the name of preserving Betsy Ross’ legacy. Two rooms of the Betsy Ross house were opened to the public – the famous parlor and a gift shop.
Built around 1740, the house itself is an unassuming structure – a two and half story building designed for living and working. Today, the house is flanked by a “civic garden” (built in 1941) and an annex building (built in 1965) containing a gift shop and exhibit space.
Entering the annex building places visitors in the gift shop, where all sorts of (anachronistic) Revolution-themed goods can be purchased. After passing through a small exhibit space and along a short breezeway, visitors enter house proper through a side-door. Once inside, visitors are lead through a series of period room recreations of the house in use circa 1777. The first stop is the parlor, the most famous room in the house. Small and cramped, the room is unremarkable in every way, whatever charm it might possess is squashed by thick piece of plexiglass protecting the objects from the visitors. The tour moves quickly through the remaining rooms – upstairs to the bedroom, downstairs to the upholstery workshop and storefront (the only room not obscured by plexiglass), into the basement to the storeroom and kitchen, and then to the courtyard. There is little information about the objects displayed in these rooms. The objects here gain value from their association with Ross, but what, if anything, belonged to Ross is left to the visitor’s imagination. The period rooms are supplemented by informational signs dealing with 18th century sewing techniques and dispelling “Myths of Colonial America.” The Museum prefers to leave the “myth” of Betsy Ross mostly intact, dealing with the dubious second hand history by putting the onus on visitors: “historical fact or well-loved legend, the story of Betsy Ross is as American as apple pie. After your visit, decide what YOU believe!”
On the surface, the Betsy Ross House is selling the standard issue heroic creation narrative. It draws visitors in with the familiar image of Ross as the creator of the first American flag, while quietly making a place for women in that narrative in its representation of domestic space. The bulk of the museum is devoted to representations of domestic and working life at the end of the 18th century, which suggest the ways in which urban women lived and worked in the colonial period. It establishes within domestic space a social and economic role for women in the birth of a nation. The significance of this is undermined by its reinforcement of the Betsy Ross legend.
Emerging scholarship on Betsy Ross, especially Marla Miller’s recent book Betsy Ross and the Making of America, “demolishes the legend of Ross as our national seamstress, offer[ing] in return someone much more interesting: a real-life artisan, wife and mother whose fortunes and travails were closely tied to the new nation” (for more on this see Marjoleine Kars' review of Miller's book in the Washington Post). The Betsy Ross House could benefit from the interrogation of legend. By adding a more complex analysis of Betsy Ross the woman and the legend, the house would become something more than just another stop on the Revolutionary tour of Philadelphia.
On the surface, the Betsy Ross House is selling the standard issue heroic creation narrative. It draws visitors in with the familiar image of Ross as the creator of the first American flag, while quietly making a place for women in that narrative in its representation of domestic space. The bulk of the museum is devoted to representations of domestic and working life at the end of the 18th century, which suggest the ways in which urban women lived and worked in the colonial period. It establishes within domestic space a social and economic role for women in the birth of a nation. The significance of this is undermined by its reinforcement of the Betsy Ross legend.
Emerging scholarship on Betsy Ross, especially Marla Miller’s recent book Betsy Ross and the Making of America, “demolishes the legend of Ross as our national seamstress, offer[ing] in return someone much more interesting: a real-life artisan, wife and mother whose fortunes and travails were closely tied to the new nation” (for more on this see Marjoleine Kars' review of Miller's book in the Washington Post). The Betsy Ross House could benefit from the interrogation of legend. By adding a more complex analysis of Betsy Ross the woman and the legend, the house would become something more than just another stop on the Revolutionary tour of Philadelphia.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI really like your article, it seems more professional that the ones of other people on your course, and is quite nico to read.
I must admit that after reading about Betsy Ross House I started to feel rather sceptic myself, thinking it is all a big fraud, but your article reminded me that the myth is not only important for a(ny) historical value, but for showing that women had their role in the Revolutionary War and in history in general. I do believe that not just Ross but other women too participated, however Ross is one of the few properly acknowledged ones, which makes her figure even more important from today's point of view.
I agree with you that the house has its significance also in the way it is showing life of women of late 18th century, however I am not sure that the Ross legend is undermining its significance as you say. If anything, I would guess that Ross will atract more people to see the house and the way of life it presents, and so more will have a chance to appreciate the house itself. On the other hand, as I have never been there I cannot say whether the ways of telling the legend are too pushy and effect-destroying or not.
And just a question at the end, do you reckon that Betsy Ross House openly presents untruths as historical facts, and if so, do they do it in order to get more visitors or to keep the legend of this woman alive? I mean, it sounds to me pretty clear that money is behind it (if I recall all the hints about gift shop in the articles), but does the house actually give something that is worth the price in return?
Anna Lorencova (UEA student of American and English Lit)
Interesting post! Reading it made me more sceptical about the story surrounding Betsy Ross. Your blog immediately makes me feel as though I’m in the museum, on the audio-guided tour surrounded by tourists eager to see the birth place of the American flag.
ReplyDeleteYou mention, “whatever charm it might possess is squashed by thick piece of Plexiglas protecting the objects from the visitors”; I always get the same feeling when visiting museums, you lose the essence and meaning of the place! I visited Salem, MA in the summer of 2009 and had exactly the same experience; Americans have a tendency to sensationalise historical events where the English do not. Salem felt fake, kitsch and corrupted.
I found your research into other sources of information regarding Betsy Ross insightful and will probably have a look at those sources you mentioned. One quick question regarding the other museums you visited, did you feel that the essence of what they were trying to portray or explain was lost or distorted by the way your country sensationalises historical events? I would find your answer helpful.
Olive Hopkin (American Studies – UEA)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi, i found your post very interesting and it gave me a much greater insight into the Betsy Ross story and how she may be viewed in America. Although its clear that the museum seems quite gimicky and a simple tourist trap, i think their main aim in portraying her story is succesful. Although most people will simply say that it is a myth, myself included, that is one of the things that makes it so attractive. In Britain we have many myths and legends which are still just as popular after hundreds of years, such as Robin Hood. I think the mystery that lays behind the story of the creation of the flag is what draws peoples attentions, and that if it was a clear cut issue then maybe the house would not have been preserved for so long. It would be interesting to know if you felt they had altered or created any historical evidence to perhaps make the story more believable to the public?
ReplyDeleteSam Hudson (American History and Politics - UEA)
Hi Ben.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very insightful post about Betsy Ross House and your descriptions of, and reactions to it are interesting to say the least. There is a quote you've added from the house which I found quite striking - "historical fact or well-loved legend, the story of Betsy Ross is as American as apple pie. After your visit, decide what YOU believe!” There is something oh so American about this line, and I don't just mean the reference to apple pie, either. There is something quite 'Disney-esque' in its tone; a glamour that seems to pervade throught American history and culture, which makes it stand out among most other notable cultures, including that of the UK. As you rightly suggested, it does seem to undermind the more sober observance of the female role in the 18th century that the main part of the museum seems to suggest. I'm curious to know just how much this more glamerous view of the past, particularly regarding the Revolution, affects the mindframe of contemporary Americans, and just how much legends such as this one affect the way you think about your country today.
Ben Bakewell - (American & English History, UEA)
Thanks to the UEA students that took the time to comment on my post on the Betsy Ross House. It’s nice to know that there are people reading this blog. A bit weird too. I will to try to address individual questions below.
ReplyDeleteAnna - Thanks for your kind words. I don’t think that the Ross legend undermines the significance of 18th century women. I do think that the museum could do a better job telling the story of those women generally, as kind of a parallel narrative to the Betsy Ross story. Come for the legend, stay for the history.
Olive - The plexiglass at the Betsy Ross House is particularly intrusive. I agree that we Americans tend toward hyperbole. As for the effect of this on museums, it’s a god idea to remember that all museums are mediated in some way. If you’re a careful, critical museumgoer (or consumer) you can limit the effect of American sensationalism. Are the English really so reserved? No hyperbole at all?
Sam - I think heroes and myths are an important part of a country’s identity. I think they often embody those traits and values we aspire to and reflect the way we (want to) see ourselves. I don’t think the Betsy Ross House fabricates any historical evidence. Additions to the house are apparent. If there is any sin here it is one of omission. My chief complaint is that it fails to interrogate the legend of Betsy Ross fully.
Ben - I agree that the “decide what YOU believe!” comment at the end of the audio-tour is very American and Disneyesque. What I find particularly interesting is the way that it places fact and fiction on an equal footing, suggesting they are equally valid. There is also an implication that it doesn’t matter whether or not its fact or fiction. It’s America, Jake. Betsy Ross is a symbol of America and she exists somewhere beyond truth. I guess what bothers me the most is that the museum stops asking questions about the story of Betsy Ross, and instead put the onus of the visitor to decide what to believe.
Thanks again for responding. Don’t hesitate to send additional questions or comments.
Best.
Ben